|
Next: Recgroups update
|
| Author |
Message |
External

Since: Mar 02, 2007 Posts: 43
|
(Msg. 1) Posted: Tue Oct 07, 2008 7:38 am
Post subject: Canadian politics pt.2 Archived from groups: rec>gambling>poker (more info?)
|
|
|
|
| PM Harper to unveil Conservative platform today. Considering the
vote is next Tuesday, I'd say this qualifies as a curious strategy.
It's seems Harper got caught flat-footed by his own early election
call. I'm going to go out on a limb and say he doesn't get that
majority gov't he was hoping for.
|
>> Stay informed about: Canadian politics pt.2 |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |  |
External

Since: Apr 14, 2008 Posts: 785
|
(Msg. 2) Posted: Tue Oct 07, 2008 7:48 am
Post subject: Re: Canadian politics pt.2 [Login to view extended thread Info.] Archived from groups: per prev. post (more info?)
|
|
|
On Oct 7 2008 10:38 AM, Mark Stringer wrote:
> PM Harper to unveil Conservative platform today. Considering the
> vote is next Tuesday, I'd say this qualifies as a curious strategy.
> It's seems Harper got caught flat-footed by his own early election
> call. I'm going to go out on a limb and say he doesn't get that
> majority gov't he was hoping for.
I saw that and found it hilarious since the advanced polls have been open
for 3 days. Hell I voted last Friday.
Chris
---
RecGroups : the community-oriented newsreader : www.recgroups.com >> Stay informed about: Canadian politics pt.2 |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |  |
External

Since: Jan 12, 2007 Posts: 2585
|
(Msg. 3) Posted: Tue Oct 07, 2008 8:28 am
Post subject: Re: Canadian politics pt.2 [Login to view extended thread Info.] Archived from groups: per prev. post (more info?)
|
|
|
On Oct 7 2008 10:38 AM, Mark Stringer wrote:
> PM Harper to unveil Conservative platform today. Considering the
> vote is next Tuesday, I'd say this qualifies as a curious strategy.
> It's seems Harper got caught flat-footed by his own early election
> call. I'm going to go out on a limb and say he doesn't get that
> majority gov't he was hoping for.
I think that's a pretty safe bet.
The conservatives are morons. I could have created a strategy that would
have very likely won a majority government, recession or no recession.
Harper et al seem to be tryign to shoot themselves in the foot.
Fell
--
Reality is only a nasty illusion brought about by having insufficient
alcohol in your bloodstream
ppdls, 08/08/08
______________________________________________________________________
RecGroups : the community-oriented newsreader : www.recgroups.com >> Stay informed about: Canadian politics pt.2 |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |  |
External

Since: Feb 13, 2008 Posts: 698
|
(Msg. 4) Posted: Tue Oct 07, 2008 3:05 pm
Post subject: Re: Canadian politics pt.2 [Login to view extended thread Info.] Archived from groups: per prev. post (more info?)
|
|
|
"FellKnight" <jordandevenport DeleteThis @hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:fpbsr5xi92.ln2@recgroups.com...
> On Oct 7 2008 10:38 AM, Mark Stringer wrote:
>
>> PM Harper to unveil Conservative platform today. Considering the
>> vote is next Tuesday, I'd say this qualifies as a curious strategy.
>> It's seems Harper got caught flat-footed by his own early election
>> call. I'm going to go out on a limb and say he doesn't get that
>> majority gov't he was hoping for.
>
> I think that's a pretty safe bet.
>
> The conservatives are morons. I could have created a strategy that would
> have very likely won a majority government, recession or no recession.
> Harper et al seem to be tryign to shoot themselves in the foot.
>
Wow! What a thread! "Canadian politics". Three whole posts.
lmaao (laughing my American ass off)
-PP >> Stay informed about: Canadian politics pt.2 |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |  |
External

Since: Apr 14, 2008 Posts: 785
|
(Msg. 5) Posted: Wed Oct 08, 2008 5:35 am
Post subject: Re: Canadian politics pt.2 [Login to view extended thread Info.] Archived from groups: per prev. post (more info?)
|
|
|
On Oct 7 2008 6:05 PM, Paul Popinjay wrote:
> "FellKnight" <jordandevenport RemoveThis @hotmail.com> wrote in message
> news:fpbsr5xi92.ln2@recgroups.com...
> > On Oct 7 2008 10:38 AM, Mark Stringer wrote:
> >
> >> PM Harper to unveil Conservative platform today. Considering the
> >> vote is next Tuesday, I'd say this qualifies as a curious strategy.
> >> It's seems Harper got caught flat-footed by his own early election
> >> call. I'm going to go out on a limb and say he doesn't get that
> >> majority gov't he was hoping for.
> >
> > I think that's a pretty safe bet.
> >
> > The conservatives are morons. I could have created a strategy that would
> > have very likely won a majority government, recession or no recession.
> > Harper et al seem to be tryign to shoot themselves in the foot.
> >
>
>
> Wow! What a thread! "Canadian politics". Three whole posts.
>
> lmaao (laughing my American ass off)
>
> -PP
Hey Paul
Can you name the 4 choices for Prime Minister and the parties they
represent?
I bet every Canadian can name the 2 choices for President and their
parties.
Chris
---
: the next generation of web-newsreaders : http://www.recgroups.com >> Stay informed about: Canadian politics pt.2 |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |  |
External

Since: Jan 12, 2007 Posts: 2585
|
(Msg. 6) Posted: Wed Oct 08, 2008 5:53 am
Post subject: Re: Canadian politics pt.2 [Login to view extended thread Info.] Archived from groups: per prev. post (more info?)
|
|
|
On Oct 8 2008 8:35 AM, charrison100 wrote:
> On Oct 7 2008 6:05 PM, Paul Popinjay wrote:
>
> > "FellKnight" <jordandevenport.TakeThisOut@hotmail.com> wrote in message
> > news:fpbsr5xi92.ln2@recgroups.com...
> > > On Oct 7 2008 10:38 AM, Mark Stringer wrote:
> > >
> > >> PM Harper to unveil Conservative platform today. Considering the
> > >> vote is next Tuesday, I'd say this qualifies as a curious strategy.
> > >> It's seems Harper got caught flat-footed by his own early election
> > >> call. I'm going to go out on a limb and say he doesn't get that
> > >> majority gov't he was hoping for.
> > >
> > > I think that's a pretty safe bet.
> > >
> > > The conservatives are morons. I could have created a strategy that would
> > > have very likely won a majority government, recession or no recession.
> > > Harper et al seem to be tryign to shoot themselves in the foot.
> > >
> >
> >
> > Wow! What a thread! "Canadian politics". Three whole posts.
> >
> > lmaao (laughing my American ass off)
> >
> > -PP
>
> Hey Paul
>
> Can you name the 4 choices for Prime Minister and the parties they
> represent?
>
> I bet every Canadian can name the 2 choices for President and their
> parties.
>
> Chris
Despite what Gilles Duceppe says, in a 5 party system it is at least
mathematically possible for him to become PM.
Fell
--
Reality is only a nasty illusion brought about by having insufficient
alcohol in your bloodstream
ppdls, 08/08/08
--------
* kill-files, watch-lists, favorites, and more.. www.recgroups.com >> Stay informed about: Canadian politics pt.2 |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |  |
External

Since: Feb 13, 2008 Posts: 698
|
(Msg. 7) Posted: Wed Oct 08, 2008 6:00 am
Post subject: Re: Canadian politics pt.2 [Login to view extended thread Info.] Archived from groups: per prev. post (more info?)
|
|
|
"charrison100" <a11faea RemoveThis @webnntp.invalid> wrote in message
news:m1mur5x9u9.ln2@recgroups.com...
>
> Hey Paul
>
> Can you name the 4 choices for Prime Minister and the parties they
> represent?
>
> I bet every Canadian can name the 2 choices for President and their
> parties.
>
What's with this Prime Minister shit? Are you going to tell me that all
this time I did not know you had one of those instead of a President? Ok, I
admit that even Popinjay still has some things to learn in life. So like,
is your Prime Minister married to your Queen or are they separate? And who
is your current Prime Minister anyway? Isn't it Kevin Trudeau or something
like that? >> Stay informed about: Canadian politics pt.2 |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |  |
External

Since: Feb 13, 2008 Posts: 698
|
(Msg. 8) Posted: Wed Oct 08, 2008 6:12 am
Post subject: Re: Canadian politics pt.2 [Login to view extended thread Info.] Archived from groups: per prev. post (more info?)
|
|
|
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |  |
External

Since: Apr 14, 2008 Posts: 785
|
(Msg. 9) Posted: Wed Oct 08, 2008 6:29 am
Post subject: Re: Canadian politics pt.2 [Login to view extended thread Info.] Archived from groups: per prev. post (more info?)
|
|
|
On Oct 8 2008 8:53 AM, FellKnight wrote:
> On Oct 8 2008 8:35 AM, charrison100 wrote:
>
> > On Oct 7 2008 6:05 PM, Paul Popinjay wrote:
> >
> > > "FellKnight" <jordandevenport.DeleteThis@hotmail.com> wrote in message
> > > news:fpbsr5xi92.ln2@recgroups.com...
> > > > On Oct 7 2008 10:38 AM, Mark Stringer wrote:
> > > >
> > > >> PM Harper to unveil Conservative platform today. Considering the
> > > >> vote is next Tuesday, I'd say this qualifies as a curious strategy.
> > > >> It's seems Harper got caught flat-footed by his own early election
> > > >> call. I'm going to go out on a limb and say he doesn't get that
> > > >> majority gov't he was hoping for.
> > > >
> > > > I think that's a pretty safe bet.
> > > >
> > > > The conservatives are morons. I could have created a strategy that
would
> > > > have very likely won a majority government, recession or no recession.
> > > > Harper et al seem to be tryign to shoot themselves in the foot.
> > > >
> > >
> > >
> > > Wow! What a thread! "Canadian politics". Three whole posts.
> > >
> > > lmaao (laughing my American ass off)
> > >
> > > -PP
> >
> > Hey Paul
> >
> > Can you name the 4 choices for Prime Minister and the parties they
> > represent?
> >
> > I bet every Canadian can name the 2 choices for President and their
> > parties.
> >
> > Chris
>
> Despite what Gilles Duceppe says, in a 5 party system it is at least
> mathematically possible for him to become PM.
>
> Fell
> --
> Reality is only a nasty illusion brought about by having insufficient
> alcohol in your bloodstream
>
> ppdls, 08/08/08
yes even though they are a non national party it is mathmatically possible
but the Bloc would have to sweep Quebec and I don't see that ever
happening.
Chris
________________________________________________________________________
* kill-files, watch-lists, favorites, and more.. www.recgroups.com >> Stay informed about: Canadian politics pt.2 |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |  |
External

Since: Apr 14, 2008 Posts: 785
|
(Msg. 10) Posted: Wed Oct 08, 2008 6:30 am
Post subject: Re: Canadian politics pt.2 [Login to view extended thread Info.] Archived from groups: per prev. post (more info?)
|
|
|
On Oct 8 2008 9:00 AM, Paul Popinjay wrote:
> "charrison100" <a11faea.DeleteThis@webnntp.invalid> wrote in message
> news:m1mur5x9u9.ln2@recgroups.com...
>
> >
> > Hey Paul
> >
> > Can you name the 4 choices for Prime Minister and the parties they
> > represent?
> >
> > I bet every Canadian can name the 2 choices for President and their
> > parties.
> >
>
>
> What's with this Prime Minister shit? Are you going to tell me that all
> this time I did not know you had one of those instead of a President? Ok, I
> admit that even Popinjay still has some things to learn in life. So like,
> is your Prime Minister married to your Queen or are they separate? And who
> is your current Prime Minister anyway? Isn't it Kevin Trudeau or something
> like that?
You are no where near as dumb as this post makes you out to be.
Chris
_______________________________________________________________________
looking for a better newsgroup-reader? - www.recgroups.com >> Stay informed about: Canadian politics pt.2 |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |  |
External

Since: Feb 13, 2008 Posts: 698
|
(Msg. 11) Posted: Wed Oct 08, 2008 6:47 am
Post subject: Re: Canadian politics pt.2 [Login to view extended thread Info.] Archived from groups: per prev. post (more info?)
|
|
|
"charrison100" <a11faea DeleteThis @webnntp.invalid> wrote in message
news:o6pur5x35a.ln2@recgroups.com...
>
> yes even though they are a non national party it is mathmatically possible
> but the Bloc would have to sweep Quebec and I don't see that ever
> happening.
>
You guys are just trying to turn this into a legitimate thread. Forget it,
it's not going to work, and it's going to remain a pathetic little ATTEMPT
at being a real RGP thread. Ha! Canadian politics? Oh, that's a good one!
You guys crack me up. >> Stay informed about: Canadian politics pt.2 |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |  |
External

Since: Apr 30, 2007 Posts: 536
|
(Msg. 12) Posted: Wed Oct 08, 2008 8:14 am
Post subject: Re: Canadian politics pt.2 [Login to view extended thread Info.] Archived from groups: per prev. post (more info?)
|
|
|
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |  |
External

Since: Apr 14, 2008 Posts: 785
|
(Msg. 13) Posted: Wed Oct 08, 2008 8:14 am
Post subject: Re: Canadian politics pt.2 [Login to view extended thread Info.] Archived from groups: per prev. post (more info?)
|
|
|
On Oct 8 2008 9:14 AM, Travel wrote:
> Well, we have to thank Canada for the troop they sent to help in Iraq;
> until they pulled him out. Everyone over there in Iraq says he was nice
> guy.
>
> _________________________________________________________
> Posted via the -Web to Usenet- forums at http://www.pokermagazine.com
> Visit www.pokermagazine.com
Fell, please confirm that I am correct in saying that in this latest "war"
we have not supplied a single troop to Iraq.
Chris
-----
: the next generation of web-newsreaders : http://www.recgroups.com >> Stay informed about: Canadian politics pt.2 |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |  |
External

Since: Mar 02, 2007 Posts: 43
|
(Msg. 14) Posted: Wed Oct 08, 2008 8:47 am
Post subject: Re: Canadian politics pt.2 [Login to view extended thread Info.] Archived from groups: per prev. post (more info?)
|
|
|
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |  |
External

Since: Jan 12, 2007 Posts: 2585
|
(Msg. 15) Posted: Wed Oct 08, 2008 9:17 am
Post subject: Re: Canadian politics pt.2 [Login to view extended thread Info.] Archived from groups: per prev. post (more info?)
|
|
|
On Oct 8 2008 9:31 AM, charrison100 wrote:
> On Oct 8 2008 9:14 AM, Travel wrote:
>
> > Well, we have to thank Canada for the troop they sent to help in Iraq;
> > until they pulled him out. Everyone over there in Iraq says he was nice
> > guy.
> >
> > _________________________________________________________
> > Posted via the -Web to Usenet- forums at http://www.pokermagazine.com
> > Visit www.pokermagazine.com
>
> Fell, please confirm that I am correct in saying that in this latest "war"
> we have not supplied a single troop to Iraq.
>
> Chris
We never sent any troops in an official or offensive capacity. We may
have sent a few (literally a handful at a time) troops as attaches to
diplomats.
Fell
--
Reality is only a nasty illusion brought about by having insufficient
alcohol in your bloodstream
ppdls, 08/08/08
-----
: the next generation of web-newsreaders : http://www.recgroups.com >> Stay informed about: Canadian politics pt.2 |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |  |