 |
|
 |
|
Next: Obama's Closest Associates are Radicals
|
| Author |
Message |
External

Since: Apr 30, 2007 Posts: 291
|
(Msg. 1) Posted: Tue Oct 07, 2008 9:19 am
Post subject: Democrat Lawyer: McCain Innocent in Keating 5 case Archived from groups: rec>gambling>poker (more info?)
|
|
|
http://voices.washingtonpost.com/the-trail/2008/10/06/mccain_lawyers_p..._back_o
In an interview, Bennett (the Washington lawyer and Democrat who
served as special counsel to the Senate Ethics Committee during the
Keating Five investigation) said McCain should never have been dragged
into the ethics case to begin with.
He said that after his own lengthy investigation, he came to the
conclusion that the case against McCain and former Sen. John Glenn (D-
Ohio) "should have been dropped"
because the evidence suggested that once McCain understood that the
Justice Department was investigating Keating, he backed off any
involvement.
Dowd noted that McCain threw Keating,once a strong supporter, out of
his office after Keating pressed him to intervene in his case.
Bennett said former Sen. Howell Hefflin (D-Ala.) insisted that the two
be included in the formal public inquiry because otherwise there would
have been a month of public hearings "with no Republicans in the
dock."
The other members of the Keating Five were Democrats. >> Stay informed about: Democrat Lawyer: McCain Innocent in Keating 5 case |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |  |
External

Since: May 02, 2008 Posts: 277
|
(Msg. 2) Posted: Tue Oct 07, 2008 9:48 am
Post subject: Re: Democrat Lawyer: McCain Innocent in Keating 5 case [Login to view extended thread Info.] Archived from groups: per prev. post (more info?)
|
|
|
On Oct 7 2008 12:19 PM, Lute wrote:
>
http://voices.washingtonpost.com/the-trail/2008/10/06/mccain_lawyers_p..._back_o
>
> In an interview, Bennett (the Washington lawyer and Democrat who
> served as special counsel to the Senate Ethics Committee during the
> Keating Five investigation) said McCain should never have been dragged
> into the ethics case to begin with.
>
> He said that after his own lengthy investigation, he came to the
> conclusion that the case against McCain and former Sen. John Glenn (D-
> Ohio) "should have been dropped"
>
> because the evidence suggested that once McCain understood that the
> Justice Department was investigating Keating, he backed off any
> involvement.
>
> Dowd noted that McCain threw Keating,once a strong supporter, out of
> his office after Keating pressed him to intervene in his case.
>
> Bennett said former Sen. Howell Hefflin (D-Ala.) insisted that the two
> be included in the formal public inquiry because otherwise there would
> have been a month of public hearings "with no Republicans in the
> dock."
>
> The other members of the Keating Five were Democrats.
The word "innocent" is being used by you in a totally false way. Bennett
is saying that he felt the case against McCain should have been dropped
because he was less culpable than three others who were being
investigated; that is far different from saying that McCain was "innocent."
These are the undisputed facts, even assuming that what Bennett is now
saying is correct:
1) After McCain and the other senators met twice with regulators, they
backed off their plans to close Keating's savings and loan. Former
regulator William Black, one of the people in on that meeting, said the
cost to taxpayers of that biggest-ever failure of a savings-and-loan grew
from $1 billion to $3.4 billion during those two years. Bennett said the
other senators were more culpable than McCain and kept up the pressure on
regulators even after that second meeting, while McCain dropped the
effort. These two meetings occurred after McCain "threw Keating out of his
office", which means the damage was done to the taxpayers after McCain
pulled this theatrical stunt.
2) Keating and friends donated $112,000 to McCain's campaigns over the
years
3) McCain's wife and father's company invested $359,000 in a Keating
shopping center.
McCain's attorney John Dowd said yesterday that McCain was not aware of
his wife's investment. But the Washington Post reported that McCain
admitted knowing about the investment during Senate hearings on the issue.
So either McCain lied yesterday or he forgot his own sworn testimony from
years ago.
-----
: the next generation of web-newsreaders : http://www.recgroups.com >> Stay informed about: Democrat Lawyer: McCain Innocent in Keating 5 case |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |  |
External

Since: Apr 30, 2007 Posts: 291
|
(Msg. 3) Posted: Tue Oct 07, 2008 10:05 am
Post subject: Re: Democrat Lawyer: McCain Innocent in Keating 5 case [Login to view extended thread Info.] Archived from groups: per prev. post (more info?)
|
|
|
Sen. Howell Hefflin (D-Ala.) insisted that the two [incl McCain]
be included in the formal public inquiry because otherwise there
would
have been a month of public hearings "with no Republicans in the
dock."
That's the crux. Bennett, a Democrat lawyer (and Bill Clinton's
attorney) is honest enough to note that McCain would not even have
been included among the miscreants, except for the one and only reason
that he is a Republican.
A ***Democrat*** McCain would never have been brought up on such a
weak case.
=*=*=
On Oct 7, 12:48 pm, "JerseyRudy" <a44f... DeleteThis @webnntp.invalid> wrote:
> On Oct 7 2008 12:19 PM, Lute wrote:
> http://voices.washingtonpost.com/the-trail/2008/10/06/mccain_lawyers_...
>
> > In an interview, Bennett (the Washington lawyer and Democrat who
> > served as special counsel to the Senate Ethics Committee during the
> > Keating Five investigation) said McCain should never have been dragged
> > into the ethics case to begin with.
>
> > He said that after his own lengthy investigation, he came to the
> > conclusion that the case against McCain and former Sen. John Glenn (D-
> > Ohio) "should have been dropped"
>
> > because the evidence suggested that once McCain understood that the
> > Justice Department was investigating Keating, he backed off any
> > involvement.
>
> > Dowd noted that McCain threw Keating,once a strong supporter, out of
> > his office after Keating pressed him to intervene in his case.
>
> > Bennett said former Sen. Howell Hefflin (D-Ala.) insisted that the two
> > be included in the formal public inquiry because otherwise there would
> > have been a month of public hearings "with no Republicans in the
> > dock."
>
> > The other members of the Keating Five were Democrats.
>
> The word "innocent" is being used by you in a totally false way. Bennett
> is saying that he felt the case against McCain should have been dropped
> because he was less culpable than three others who were being
> investigated; that is far different from saying that McCain was "innocent.."
>
> These are the undisputed facts, even assuming that what Bennett is now
> saying is correct:
>
> 1) After McCain and the other senators met twice with regulators, they
> backed off their plans to close Keating's savings and loan. Former
> regulator William Black, one of the people in on that meeting, said the
> cost to taxpayers of that biggest-ever failure of a savings-and-loan grew
> from $1 billion to $3.4 billion during those two years. Bennett said the
> other senators were more culpable than McCain and kept up the pressure on
> regulators even after that second meeting, while McCain dropped the
> effort. These two meetings occurred after McCain "threw Keating out of his
> office", which means the damage was done to the taxpayers after McCain
> pulled this theatrical stunt.
>
> 2) Keating and friends donated $112,000 to McCain's campaigns over the
> years
>
> 3) McCain's wife and father's company invested $359,000 in a Keating
> shopping center.
> McCain's attorney John Dowd said yesterday that McCain was not aware of
> his wife's investment. But the Washington Post reported that McCain
> admitted knowing about the investment during Senate hearings on the issue..
> So either McCain lied yesterday or he forgot his own sworn testimony from
> years ago.
>
> -----
> : the next generation of web-newsreaders :http://www.recgroups.com- Hide quoted text -
>
> - Show quoted text - >> Stay informed about: Democrat Lawyer: McCain Innocent in Keating 5 case |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |  |
External

Since: May 02, 2008 Posts: 277
|
(Msg. 4) Posted: Tue Oct 07, 2008 10:24 am
Post subject: Re: Democrat Lawyer: McCain Innocent in Keating 5 case [Login to view extended thread Info.] Archived from groups: per prev. post (more info?)
|
|
|
On Oct 7 2008 1:05 PM, Lute wrote:
> Sen. Howell Hefflin (D-Ala.) insisted that the two [incl McCain]
> be included in the formal public inquiry because otherwise there
> would
> have been a month of public hearings "with no Republicans in the
> dock."
>
> That's the crux. Bennett, a Democrat lawyer (and Bill Clinton's
> attorney) is honest enough to note that McCain would not even have
> been included among the miscreants, except for the one and only reason
> that he is a Republican.
>
> A ***Democrat*** McCain would never have been brought up on such a
> weak case.
>
> =*=*=
You already stated that point. Now it would help if you actually addressed
the specific charges against McCain. You ignore the fact that there were
no charges filed against 95 of the 100 Senators. McCain and four other
Senators were the only ones in which there was enough evidence to initiate
the process against. I already based my comments on the assumption that
Bennett is correct, and that the most serious charges were against the
other 3 Senators, and not McCain or Glenn.
The facts are the facts. McCain participated in two meetings in which
pressure was put on Federal Regulators to not proceed with shutting down
Lincoln Savings and Loan. The cost to taxpayers of the resulting 2 year
delay in closing Lincoln was estimated at $2.4 billion. Keating and
friends donated $112,000 to McCain's campaigns over the years. McCain's
wife and father's company invested $359,000 in a Keating shopping center.
Yesterday McCain either lied or forgot his earlier sworn testimony
regarding his knowledge of his wife's investment.
________________________________________________________________________
RecGroups : the community-oriented newsreader : www.recgroups.com >> Stay informed about: Democrat Lawyer: McCain Innocent in Keating 5 case |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |  |
External

Since: Apr 30, 2007 Posts: 291
|
(Msg. 5) Posted: Tue Oct 07, 2008 11:58 am
Post subject: Re: Democrat Lawyer: McCain Innocent in Keating 5 case [Login to view extended thread Info.] Archived from groups: per prev. post (more info?)
|
|
|
I can only speak to the facts at my disposal.
Those facts are plain.
McCain's inclusion in the "docket" was purely political.
Whatever guilt he may have had, it was not sufficient to pursue any
further.
Were McCain guilty of something, I would be happy to see him
prosecuted and punished on the same basis as any other person guilty
of the same misdeed.
And mark this: the mainstream media will show 100 times the interest
in any McCain misdeed as they will in Obama's real estate dealings
with Tony Rezko.
Frankly, I'm not pro-McCain. I disagree with him on numerous
substantive issues.
But Obama is such a malignant alternative, for so many reasons,
that I have to vote for McCain.
=*=*=
On Oct 7, 1:24 pm, "JerseyRudy" <a44f....RemoveThis@webnntp.invalid> wrote:
> On Oct 7 2008 1:05 PM, Lute wrote:
>
> > Sen. Howell Hefflin (D-Ala.) insisted that the two [incl McCain]
> > be included in the formal public inquiry because otherwise there
> > would
> > have been a month of public hearings "with no Republicans in the
> > dock."
>
> > That's the crux. Bennett, a Democrat lawyer (and Bill Clinton's
> > attorney) is honest enough to note that McCain would not even have
> > been included among the miscreants, except for the one and only reason
> > that he is a Republican.
>
> > A ***Democrat*** McCain would never have been brought up on such a
> > weak case.
>
> > =*=*=
>
> You already stated that point. Now it would help if you actually addressed
> the specific charges against McCain. You ignore the fact that there were
> no charges filed against 95 of the 100 Senators. McCain and four other
> Senators were the only ones in which there was enough evidence to initiate
> the process against. I already based my comments on the assumption that
> Bennett is correct, and that the most serious charges were against the
> other 3 Senators, and not McCain or Glenn.
>
> The facts are the facts. McCain participated in two meetings in which
> pressure was put on Federal Regulators to not proceed with shutting down
> Lincoln Savings and Loan. The cost to taxpayers of the resulting 2 year
> delay in closing Lincoln was estimated at $2.4 billion. Keating and
> friends donated $112,000 to McCain's campaigns over the years. McCain's
> wife and father's company invested $359,000 in a Keating shopping center.
> Yesterday McCain either lied or forgot his earlier sworn testimony
> regarding his knowledge of his wife's investment.
>
> ________________________________________________________________________
> RecGroups : the community-oriented newsreader :www.recgroups.com >> Stay informed about: Democrat Lawyer: McCain Innocent in Keating 5 case |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |  |
External

Since: May 02, 2008 Posts: 277
|
(Msg. 6) Posted: Tue Oct 07, 2008 12:22 pm
Post subject: Re: Democrat Lawyer: McCain Innocent in Keating 5 case [Login to view extended thread Info.] Archived from groups: per prev. post (more info?)
|
|
|
On Oct 7 2008 2:58 PM, Lute wrote:
> I can only speak to the facts at my disposal.
> Those facts are plain.
> McCain's inclusion in the "docket" was purely political.
> Whatever guilt he may have had, it was not sufficient to pursue any
> further.
> Were McCain guilty of something, I would be happy to see him
> prosecuted and punished on the same basis as any other person guilty
> of the same misdeed.
> And mark this: the mainstream media will show 100 times the interest
> in any McCain misdeed as they will in Obama's real estate dealings
> with Tony Rezko.
> Frankly, I'm not pro-McCain. I disagree with him on numerous
> substantive issues.
> But Obama is such a malignant alternative, for so many reasons,
> that I have to vote for McCain.
>
> =*=*=
The bottom line is that nobody in the "mainstream media" or in the Obama
campaign had any interest in pursuing the Keating story until the McCain
campaign made the decision over the weekend to attack Obama based on the
principle of guilt-by-association. Everyone else would prefer talking
about the economy, but because McCain has fallen in the polls he wants to
change the subject.
Now that he has changed the subject, this Keating stuff (and other stuff)
is coming back at him, which is what happens when someone in a glass house
starts throwing stones.
>
> On Oct 7, 1:24 pm, "JerseyRudy" <a44f....DeleteThis@webnntp.invalid> wrote:
> > On Oct 7 2008 1:05 PM, Lute wrote:
> >
> > > Sen. Howell Hefflin (D-Ala.) insisted that the two [incl McCain]
> > > be included in the formal public inquiry because otherwise there
> > > would
> > > have been a month of public hearings "with no Republicans in the
> > > dock."
> >
> > > That's the crux. Bennett, a Democrat lawyer (and Bill Clinton's
> > > attorney) is honest enough to note that McCain would not even have
> > > been included among the miscreants, except for the one and only reason
> > > that he is a Republican.
> >
> > > A ***Democrat*** McCain would never have been brought up on such a
> > > weak case.
> >
> > > =*=*=
> >
> > You already stated that point. Now it would help if you actually addressed
> > the specific charges against McCain. You ignore the fact that there were
> > no charges filed against 95 of the 100 Senators. McCain and four other
> > Senators were the only ones in which there was enough evidence to initiate
> > the process against. I already based my comments on the assumption that
> > Bennett is correct, and that the most serious charges were against the
> > other 3 Senators, and not McCain or Glenn.
> >
> > The facts are the facts. McCain participated in two meetings in which
> > pressure was put on Federal Regulators to not proceed with shutting down
> > Lincoln Savings and Loan. The cost to taxpayers of the resulting 2 year
> > delay in closing Lincoln was estimated at $2.4 billion. Keating and
> > friends donated $112,000 to McCain's campaigns over the years. McCain's
> > wife and father's company invested $359,000 in a Keating shopping center.
> > Yesterday McCain either lied or forgot his earlier sworn testimony
> > regarding his knowledge of his wife's investment.
> >
________________________________________________________________________
* kill-files, watch-lists, favorites, and more.. www.recgroups.com >> Stay informed about: Democrat Lawyer: McCain Innocent in Keating 5 case |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |  |
External

Since: Apr 30, 2007 Posts: 291
|
(Msg. 7) Posted: Tue Oct 07, 2008 1:28 pm
Post subject: Re: Democrat Lawyer: McCain Innocent in Keating 5 case [Login to view extended thread Info.] Archived from groups: per prev. post (more info?)
|
|
|
Except that McCain does not live in a glass house.
The very worst that can be said of his involvement in Keating 5 is
that
whatever his misdeeds, they were considered insignificant for pursuit.
His main crime was in being a Republican, and except for that,
he would never have been investigated in Keating.
Obama lives in a soap bubble, and the only reason it has
not been punctured is because the mainstream press has spent more time
attacking Bristol Palin than in examining Obama's associations with
criminals, terrorists, and anti-American polemicists.
Obama's camp had already attacked McCain on his associations with CEOs
of major companies who got golden parachutes.
Fair enough. Let's examine those relationships in detail.
You can bet that will happen.
But Obama will not be scrutinized with even ten percent of the zeal.
Imagine if Bristol Palin had dated a terrorist.
Just imagine the 24/7 press coverage.
=*=*=
On Oct 7, 3:22 pm, "JerseyRudy" <a44f....TakeThisOut@webnntp.invalid> wrote:
> On Oct 7 2008 2:58 PM, Lute wrote:
>
>
>
>
>
> > I can only speak to the facts at my disposal.
> > Those facts are plain.
> > McCain's inclusion in the "docket" was purely political.
> > Whatever guilt he may have had, it was not sufficient to pursue any
> > further.
> > Were McCain guilty of something, I would be happy to see him
> > prosecuted and punished on the same basis as any other person guilty
> > of the same misdeed.
> > And mark this: the mainstream media will show 100 times the interest
> > in any McCain misdeed as they will in Obama's real estate dealings
> > with Tony Rezko.
> > Frankly, I'm not pro-McCain. I disagree with him on numerous
> > substantive issues.
> > But Obama is such a malignant alternative, for so many reasons,
> > that I have to vote for McCain.
>
> > =*=*=
>
> The bottom line is that nobody in the "mainstream media" or in the Obama
> campaign had any interest in pursuing the Keating story until the McCain
> campaign made the decision over the weekend to attack Obama based on the
> principle of guilt-by-association. Everyone else would prefer talking
> about the economy, but because McCain has fallen in the polls he wants to
> change the subject.
>
> Now that he has changed the subject, this Keating stuff (and other stuff)
> is coming back at him, which is what happens when someone in a glass house
> starts throwing stones.
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> > On Oct 7, 1:24 pm, "JerseyRudy" <a44f....TakeThisOut@webnntp.invalid> wrote:
> > > On Oct 7 2008 1:05 PM, Lute wrote:
>
> > > > Sen. Howell Hefflin (D-Ala.) insisted that the two [incl McCain]
> > > > be included in the formal public inquiry because otherwise there
> > > > would
> > > > have been a month of public hearings "with no Republicans in the
> > > > dock."
>
> > > > That's the crux. Bennett, a Democrat lawyer (and Bill Clinton's
> > > > attorney) is honest enough to note that McCain would not even have
> > > > been included among the miscreants, except for the one and only reason
> > > > that he is a Republican.
>
> > > > A ***Democrat*** McCain would never have been brought up on such a
> > > > weak case.
>
> > > > =*=*=
>
> > > You already stated that point. Now it would help if you actually addressed
> > > the specific charges against McCain. You ignore the fact that there were
> > > no charges filed against 95 of the 100 Senators. McCain and four other
> > > Senators were the only ones in which there was enough evidence to initiate
> > > the process against. I already based my comments on the assumption that
> > > Bennett is correct, and that the most serious charges were against the
> > > other 3 Senators, and not McCain or Glenn.
>
> > > The facts are the facts. McCain participated in two meetings in which
> > > pressure was put on Federal Regulators to not proceed with shutting down
> > > Lincoln Savings and Loan. The cost to taxpayers of the resulting 2 year
> > > delay in closing Lincoln was estimated at $2.4 billion. Keating and
> > > friends donated $112,000 to McCain's campaigns over the years. McCain's
> > > wife and father's company invested $359,000 in a Keating shopping center.
> > > Yesterday McCain either lied or forgot his earlier sworn testimony
> > > regarding his knowledge of his wife's investment.
>
> ________________________________________________________________________
> * kill-files, watch-lists, favorites, and more..www.recgroups.com- Hide quoted text -
>
> - Show quoted text -- Hide quoted text -
>
> - Show quoted text - >> Stay informed about: Democrat Lawyer: McCain Innocent in Keating 5 case |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |  |
External

Since: May 02, 2008 Posts: 277
|
(Msg. 8) Posted: Tue Oct 07, 2008 2:00 pm
Post subject: Re: Democrat Lawyer: McCain Innocent in Keating 5 case [Login to view extended thread Info.] Archived from groups: per prev. post (more info?)
|
|
|
On Oct 7 2008 4:28 PM, Lute wrote:
> Except that McCain does not live in a glass house.
> The very worst that can be said of his involvement in Keating 5 is
> that
> whatever his misdeeds, they were considered insignificant for pursuit.
> His main crime was in being a Republican, and except for that,
> he would never have been investigated in Keating.
Now you are totally twisting what even Bennett has said in McCain's
defense. Nobody has said that he should not have been investigated as one
of the Keating 5. What Bennett said yesterday is that his recommendation
at the conclusion of the investigation was that the case against McCain
and Glenn should not have proceeded to a formal public inquiry.
There are many others involved in the investigation who strongly disagree
with Bennett. William Black, a former deputy director of the Federal
Savings and Loan Insurance Corporation says, “Charles Keating was and is a
very nasty, fraudulent guy.” He says that the senators tried to
“intimidate” regulators into postponing new savings and loan regulations
and that the collapse of Lincoln, which remained open until 1989, became
“the most expensive failure in U.S. history of a depository institution.”
“Senator McCain knew the facts,” Mr. Black says, “because we had briefed
him. He knew this was a criminal enterprise. He knew that what was being
done was improper. He knew how much undue political pressure — his words,
at least his words originally — was being brought to bear. He was uniquely
in a position where he could have protested this, and stopped it, stopped
this loss, but he did nothing.”
That's what I call living in a glass house.
________________________________________________________________________
RecGroups : the community-oriented newsreader : www.recgroups.com >> Stay informed about: Democrat Lawyer: McCain Innocent in Keating 5 case |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |  |
External

Since: May 02, 2008 Posts: 238
|
(Msg. 9) Posted: Tue Oct 07, 2008 2:57 pm
Post subject: Re: Democrat Lawyer: McCain Innocent in Keating 5 case [Login to view extended thread Info.] Archived from groups: per prev. post (more info?)
|
|
|
On Oct 7 2008 12:19 PM, Lute wrote:
>
http://voices.washingtonpost.com/the-trail/2008/10/06/mccain_lawyers_p..._back_o
>
> In an interview, Bennett (the Washington lawyer and Democrat who
> served as special counsel to the Senate Ethics Committee during the
> Keating Five investigation) said McCain should never have been dragged
> into the ethics case to begin with.
>
> He said that after his own lengthy investigation, he came to the
> conclusion that the case against McCain and former Sen. John Glenn (D-
> Ohio) "should have been dropped"
>
> because the evidence suggested that once McCain understood that the
> Justice Department was investigating Keating, he backed off any
> involvement.
>
> Dowd noted that McCain threw Keating,once a strong supporter, out of
> his office after Keating pressed him to intervene in his case.
>
> Bennett said former Sen. Howell Hefflin (D-Ala.) insisted that the two
> be included in the formal public inquiry because otherwise there would
> have been a month of public hearings "with no Republicans in the
> dock."
>
> The other members of the Keating Five were Democrats.
It's funny how you don't believe anything you hear from a Democrat, until
you hear something that mirrors your pre-conceptions.
-----
: the next generation of web-newsreaders : http://www.recgroups.com >> Stay informed about: Democrat Lawyer: McCain Innocent in Keating 5 case |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |  |
External

Since: May 02, 2008 Posts: 238
|
(Msg. 10) Posted: Tue Oct 07, 2008 2:58 pm
Post subject: Re: Democrat Lawyer: McCain Innocent in Keating 5 case [Login to view extended thread Info.] Archived from groups: per prev. post (more info?)
|
|
|
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |  |
External

Since: Jul 17, 2008 Posts: 1298
|
(Msg. 11) Posted: Tue Oct 07, 2008 5:17 pm
Post subject: Re: Democrat Lawyer: McCain Innocent in Keating 5 case [Login to view extended thread Info.] Archived from groups: per prev. post (more info?)
|
|
|
On Oct 7 2008 12:19 PM, Lute wrote:
>
http://voices.washingtonpost.com/the-trail/2008/10/06/mccain_lawyers_p..._back_o
>
> In an interview, Bennett (the Washington lawyer and Democrat who
> served as special counsel to the Senate Ethics Committee during the
> Keating Five investigation) said McCain should never have been dragged
> into the ethics case to begin with.
Paid by McCain to say that !!
>
> He said that after his own lengthy investigation, he came to the
> conclusion that the case against McCain and former Sen. John Glenn (D-
> Ohio) "should have been dropped"
He investigated his cash cow? LOL
>
> because the evidence suggested that once McCain understood that the
> Justice Department was investigating Keating, he backed off any
> involvement.
So, as soon as they knew they were being watched they quit? Thats a
defense ?
>
> Dowd noted that McCain threw Keating,once a strong supporter, out of
> his office after Keating pressed him to intervene in his case.
So .. he is also guilty of assault?
>
> Bennett said former Sen. Howell Hefflin (D-Ala.) insisted that the two
> be included in the formal public inquiry because otherwise there would
> have been a month of public hearings "with no Republicans in the
> dock."
cite please?
>
> The other members of the Keating Five were Democrats.
SENFD THIS TO FOX.. They might put you on the air!!
FUCKIN MORON !!
Thank you Lord for the TV Scooter Morons we are about to deceive
_______________________________________________________________________
RecGroups : the community-oriented newsreader : www.recgroups.com >> Stay informed about: Democrat Lawyer: McCain Innocent in Keating 5 case |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |  |
External

Since: Mar 02, 2007 Posts: 2431
|
(Msg. 12) Posted: Wed Oct 08, 2008 12:25 am
Post subject: Re: Democrat Lawyer: McCain Innocent in Keating 5 case [Login to view extended thread Info.] Archived from groups: per prev. post (more info?)
|
|
|
"ChrisRobin" <a9dbf1e RemoveThis @webnntp.invalid> wrote in message
news:aj2tr5xvh4.ln2@recgroups.com...
> On Oct 7 2008 12:19 PM, Lute wrote:
>
>>
> http://voices.washingtonpost.com/the-trail/2008/10/06/mccain_lawyers_p..._back_o
>>
>> In an interview, Bennett (the Washington lawyer and Democrat who
>> served as special counsel to the Senate Ethics Committee during the
>> Keating Five investigation) said McCain should never have been dragged
>> into the ethics case to begin with.
>>
>> He said that after his own lengthy investigation, he came to the
>> conclusion that the case against McCain and former Sen. John Glenn (D-
>> Ohio) "should have been dropped"
>>
>> because the evidence suggested that once McCain understood that the
>> Justice Department was investigating Keating, he backed off any
>> involvement.
>>
>> Dowd noted that McCain threw Keating,once a strong supporter, out of
>> his office after Keating pressed him to intervene in his case.
>>
>> Bennett said former Sen. Howell Hefflin (D-Ala.) insisted that the two
>> be included in the formal public inquiry because otherwise there would
>> have been a month of public hearings "with no Republicans in the
>> dock."
>>
>> The other members of the Keating Five were Democrats.
>
> It's funny how you don't believe anything you hear from a Democrat, until
> you hear something that mirrors your pre-conceptions.
It's called negating bias. >> Stay informed about: Democrat Lawyer: McCain Innocent in Keating 5 case |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |  |
|
You can post new topics in this forum You can reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum
|
|
|
|
 |
|
|