Just tell the doctor what you see, Paul...

But you are. Ok, don't confess. Most of us alreay know and will spare
you the humility.

On Jul 22, 4:51�pm, K.T. Constanjuror88poet
<ktconstanjuror88p....TakeThisOut@aol.com> wrote:
> On Tue, 22 Jul 2008 16:42:01 -0700, "Robert Ladd" <rla....TakeThisOut@cox.net>
> wrote:
>
> >It really burns your ass when someone agrees with Russ, especially if they
> >are right, doesn't it?
>
> >Robert Ladd
>
> How can something subjective like Russ's credibility (my post was
> referring to Paul's unbounded faith in it) be deemed "right" by YOU,
> Dubya 2?
>
> FFS, you're not as dumb as the original Dubya, are ya?
>
>
>
> >"K.T. Constanjuror88poet" <ktconstanjuror88p....TakeThisOut@aol.com> wrote in message
> >news:u3rc84tsbjs3nm24p7b5sighpiqrmric31@4ax.com...
> >> It'll save Russ the cost of the colonoscopy.- Hide quoted text -
>
> - Show quoted text -
 >> Stay informed about: Just tell the doctor what you see, Paul... 

On Tue, 22 Jul 2008 16:42:01 -0700, "Robert Ladd" <rladd5.DeleteThis@cox.net>
wrote:

>It really burns your ass when someone agrees with Russ, especially if they
>are right, doesn't it?
>
>Robert Ladd

How can something subjective like Russ's credibility (my post was
referring to Paul's unbounded faith in it) be deemed "right" by YOU,
Dubya 2?

FFS, you're not as dumb as the original Dubya, are ya?


>"K.T. Constanjuror88poet" <ktconstanjuror88poet.DeleteThis@aol.com> wrote in message
>news:u3rc84tsbjs3nm24p7b5sighpiqrmric31@4ax.com...
>> It'll save Russ the cost of the colonoscopy.
>
 >> Stay informed about: Just tell the doctor what you see, Paul... 

I didn't even mention whether PP was right or not. My question didn't
include that as a conclusion. I was referring to your "unbounded" burning
when someone sides with Russ on any issue. I just threw in my observation
that you "smoke" even more if they are correct. That ok with you Jeb?

Robert Ladd

"K.T. Constanjuror88poet" <ktconstanjuror88poet.TakeThisOut@aol.com> wrote in message
news:o1sc849b2fqeo9fu8v3p7gme401mnifhbu@4ax.com...
> On Tue, 22 Jul 2008 16:42:01 -0700, "Robert Ladd" <rladd5.TakeThisOut@cox.net>
> wrote:
>
>>It really burns your ass when someone agrees with Russ, especially if they
>>are right, doesn't it?
>>
>>Robert Ladd
>
> How can something subjective like Russ's credibility (my post was
> referring to Paul's unbounded faith in it) be deemed "right" by YOU,
> Dubya 2?
>
> FFS, you're not as dumb as the original Dubya, are ya?
>
>
>>"K.T. Constanjuror88poet" <ktconstanjuror88poet.TakeThisOut@aol.com> wrote in message
>>news:u3rc84tsbjs3nm24p7b5sighpiqrmric31@4ax.com...
>>> It'll save Russ the cost of the colonoscopy.
>>
>
 >> Stay informed about: Just tell the doctor what you see, Paul... 

On Tue, 22 Jul 2008 16:57:53 -0700 (PDT), "RussGeorgiev@aol.com"
<RussGeorgiev.TakeThisOut@aol.com> wrote:

>But you are. Ok, don't confess. Most of us alreay know and will spare
>you the humility.

I know you've been workin' your fifi like a bitch in heat while
reading Paul & Robert's posts, Russ... but don't be fooled, the
majority of RGP still knows you're full o' shit.
 >> Stay informed about: Just tell the doctor what you see, Paul... 

On Tue, 22 Jul 2008 17:21:41 -0700, "Robert Ladd" <rladd5.RemoveThis@cox.net>
wrote:

>I didn't even mention whether PP was right or not.

LOL... classic, and I mean *CLASSIC* dodge attempt: I name a thread,
"Just tell the doctor what you see, Paul" (!), you chime in with the
words, "especially if they are right", and we're now suppose to
believe you weren't referring to PP being "right"???

Who do you think you're zooming here, Dubya 2? (And this is
*precisely* how you got the W... you WEASEL.)

Let me now say what we both know to be true, but what we both know
you'll never admit to: You made the wrong assumption that my post was
referring to how Paul backed up Russ in the "Doggysht" thread re:
COLE/MIGDAL. And, b/c it seems reasonable that Russ has those select
facts correct, you not only deemed Russ correct, but Paul correct as
well (for showing his support). I come along and start this thread --
referencing a different thread I POSTED IN -- regarding Russ's overall
credibility, and you completely misinterpret it and apply it to
COLE/MIGDAL.

You know that's true... I know that's true... but again, we also both
know you're never going to admit that at this point.

Additionally, you also misinterpreted the tenor of my post... must be
that famous Ladd humor taking a siesta, huh?

> My question didn't include that as a conclusion.

LOL... nice try but pssst: THE DODGE AIN'T WORKING.

> I was referring to your "unbounded" burning
>when someone sides with Russ on any issue.

You disingenuous weasel... and I'll PROVE it.

Yesterday into today, there have been copious Russ postings about all
kinds of things with a smattering of "someone sides with Russ"... do I
appear in ANY of those threads from yesterday, weasel? (and yes, I
posted yesterday). Matter o' fact, in the zillions of Russ shit over
the last month, do I even appear in 1% of them?... do I, weasel?

Didn't think so. Hardly proper to characterize my position as an
"unbounded burning", Bob.

> I just threw in my observation
>that you "smoke" even more if they are correct.

1) Correctness determined by WHO exactly and 2) of the copious
Russ-related postings you can find me in more than 1% of them
"smoking", huh? and 3) your ability to misinterpret ("smoke" with
humor, like in my OP here) is impressive.

> That ok with you Jeb?

Actually, NO, it isn't, Skipper... and I from this point forward no
longer consider myself your "good buddy".

>Robert W. Ladd
>
>"K.T. Constanjuror88poet" <ktconstanjuror88poet.RemoveThis@aol.com> wrote in message
>news:o1sc849b2fqeo9fu8v3p7gme401mnifhbu@4ax.com...
>> On Tue, 22 Jul 2008 16:42:01 -0700, "Robert Ladd" <rladd5.RemoveThis@cox.net>
>> wrote:
>>
>>>It really burns your ass when someone agrees with Russ, especially if they
>>>are right, doesn't it?
>>>
>>>Robert Ladd
>>
>> How can something subjective like Russ's credibility (my post was
>> referring to Paul's unbounded faith in it) be deemed "right" by YOU,
>> Dubya 2?
>>
>> FFS, you're not as dumb as the original Dubya, are ya?
>>
>>
>>>"K.T. Constanjuror88poet" <ktconstanjuror88poet.RemoveThis@aol.com> wrote in message
>>>news:u3rc84tsbjs3nm24p7b5sighpiqrmric31@4ax.com...
>>>> It'll save Russ the cost of the colonoscopy.
>>>
>>
>
 >> Stay informed about: Just tell the doctor what you see, Paul... 

"K.T. Constanjuror88poet" <ktconstanjuror88poet DeleteThis @aol.com> wrote in message

> ... and I from this point forward no
> longer consider myself your "good buddy".
>

Wtf? You just called him 'Bob'!
 >> Stay informed about: Just tell the doctor what you see, Paul... 

"K.T. Constanjuror88poet" <ktconstanjuror88poet.TakeThisOut@aol.com> wrote in message
news:djuc84plf5jb107qjr06m44de8gtub5jss@4ax.com...
> On Tue, 22 Jul 2008 17:21:41 -0700, "Robert Ladd" <rladd5.TakeThisOut@cox.net>
> wrote:
>
>>I didn't even mention whether PP was right or not.
>
> LOL... classic, and I mean *CLASSIC* dodge attempt: I name a thread,
> "Just tell the doctor what you see, Paul" (!), you chime in with the
> words, "especially if they are right", and we're now suppose to
> believe you weren't referring to PP being "right"???
>

Look who's talking about dodging? My sentence wasn't a confirmation of PP
being correct, but you'll pull a portion of the sentence out of context (you
do understand that this is a no-no, right?) so that you can take the heat
off the real subject of my comment.

The real subject is that I was wondering if it burns your ass when people
post agreeing with Russ. This obsession is probably not good for you. I'm
only telling you this because you really need to seek some help Jeb. Oh,
BTW, I really do think that it burns your ass even more when Russ and the
person that agrees with him are making a point that you can't dispute.
Twist it however you like. Pull your sleight of hand magic trick, but in
the end, most people are watching you and sadly shaking their heads.

>
> Who do you think you're zooming here, Dubya 2? (And this is
> *precisely* how you got the W... you WEASEL.)
>
> Let me now say what we both know to be true, but what we both know
> you'll never admit to: You made the wrong assumption that my post was
> referring to how Paul backed up Russ in the "Doggysht" thread re:
> COLE/MIGDAL.
>

Don't be a silly boy. Of course I'd never admit to something I didn't mean.
Just because you say that's what I meant doesn't make it so. And I doubt
you have the ability to know what I assumed. But, of course, you're sinking
in quicksand here so grab at any branch.

>
>And, b/c it seems reasonable that Russ has those select
> facts correct, you not only deemed Russ correct, but Paul correct as
> well (for showing his support). I come along and start this thread --
> referencing a different thread I POSTED IN -- regarding Russ's overall
> credibility, and you completely misinterpret it and apply it to
> COLE/MIGDAL.
>

Besides magic you also read minds now too. That's nice. But, alas it
seems that in this case your mind-reading talent has also deserted you.

> You know that's true... I know that's true... but again, we also both
> know you're never going to admit that at this point.
>

I have no knowledge that anything you know is true. And I wouldn't pretend
that I did know that. I would hope that you wouldn't pretend to state that
you know what I "know that's true".

> Additionally, you also misinterpreted the tenor of my post... must be
> that famous Ladd humor taking a siesta, huh?
>

Oh my, you're wrong again. This is a bad day for you, isn't it? I did find
humor in your little post. And I understood it's intent completely.

>
>> My question didn't include that as a conclusion.
>
> LOL... nice try but pssst: THE DODGE AIN'T WORKING.
>

There's no dodge silly boy. But keep trying to divert the attention away
from the true subject of my post which is your "burning" obsession.

>
>> I was referring to your "unbounded" burning
>>when someone sides with Russ on any issue.
>
> You disingenuous weasel... and I'll PROVE it.
>

Why do you always have to descend to name calling?

>
> Yesterday into today, there have been copious Russ postings about all
> kinds of things with a smattering of "someone sides with Russ"... do I
> appear in ANY of those threads from yesterday, weasel? (and yes, I
> posted yesterday). Matter o' fact, in the zillions of Russ shit over
> the last month, do I even appear in 1% of them?... do I, weasel?
>

And because you didn't post a comment in all, or even any, of the pro-Russ
posts, your little mind thinks that you can convince me or others that it
confirms that your ass wasn't burning on every one of them? I think not.
You can try to obfuscate the true meaning of my post using this kind of
logic, but it really doesn't fly.

>
> Didn't think so. Hardly proper to characterize my position as an
> "unbounded burning", Bob.
>
>> I just threw in my observation
>>that you "smoke" even more if they are correct.
>
> 1) Correctness determined by WHO exactly and 2) of the copious
> Russ-related postings you can find me in more than 1% of them
> "smoking", huh? and 3) your ability to misinterpret ("smoke" with
> humor, like in my OP here) is impressive.
>

Oh, I got your humor, and I actually thought it was a funny line....well,
the combination of the subject line and the body of the post together that
is. I have to be quite literal in everything I type concerning you, or
you'll twist it into whatever suits your fancy. And yes, I realize you
post on quite a few other subjects, and you choose not to post on many of
the pro-Russ posts, but the question that I posed is, and I'll keep it a
little less cumbersome so you won't be confused this time. It really burns
your ass when someone agrees with Russ, doesn't it? And if it appears that
the post was correct, my guess is that even burns your ass more. Am I
correct in that guess too, Jeb ol' boy?

>
>> That ok with you Jeb?
>
> Actually, NO, it isn't, Skipper... and I from this point forward no
> longer consider myself your "good buddy".
>

Now that's a shame. Not getting together for a night of fun and visiting
Russ Hamilton, or hanging around with Wayno and Badger? Now I might almost
regret posting in this thread. Then again, maybe not. Have a nice one
Jebster.

Robert Ladd
>
>
>>Robert W. Ladd
>>
>>"K.T. Constanjuror88poet" <ktconstanjuror88poet.TakeThisOut@aol.com> wrote in message
>>news:o1sc849b2fqeo9fu8v3p7gme401mnifhbu@4ax.com...
>>> On Tue, 22 Jul 2008 16:42:01 -0700, "Robert Ladd" <rladd5.TakeThisOut@cox.net>
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>>>It really burns your ass when someone agrees with Russ, especially if
>>>>they
>>>>are right, doesn't it?
>>>>
>>>>Robert Ladd
>>>
>>> How can something subjective like Russ's credibility (my post was
>>> referring to Paul's unbounded faith in it) be deemed "right" by YOU,
>>> Dubya 2?
>>>
>>> FFS, you're not as dumb as the original Dubya, are ya?
>>>
>>>
>>>>"K.T. Constanjuror88poet" <ktconstanjuror88poet.TakeThisOut@aol.com> wrote in
>>>>message
>>>>news:u3rc84tsbjs3nm24p7b5sighpiqrmric31@4ax.com...
>>>>> It'll save Russ the cost of the colonoscopy.
>>>>
>>>
>>
>
 >> Stay informed about: Just tell the doctor what you see, Paul... 

Yes he did, but I think my post also burned his ass so much that I believe
that he is going to back out on our "best buddy" arrangement. So it appears
that I've been relegated back to "Weasel" or Dubya 2 or something else.

Robert Ladd

"Paul Popinjay" <paulpopinjay[no spam]@sbcglobal.net> wrote in message
news:NYwhk.30931$co7.25340@nlpi066.nbdc.sbc.com...
> "K.T. Constanjuror88poet" <ktconstanjuror88poet RemoveThis @aol.com> wrote in message
>
>> ... and I from this point forward no
>> longer consider myself your "good buddy".
>>
>
> Wtf? You just called him 'Bob'!
>
 >> Stay informed about: Just tell the doctor what you see, Paul... 

I agree with Russ on many things.

1. I like money
2. I like cats
3. I like women
4. I like poker




On Jul 22 2008 4:42 PM, Robert Ladd wrote:

> It really burns your ass when someone agrees with Russ, especially if they
> are right, doesn't it?
>
> Robert Ladd


RazzO
"Your all is idiots!" - Mike Matusow

--- 
RecGroups : the community-oriented newsreader : www.recgroups.com
 >> Stay informed about: Just tell the doctor what you see, Paul... 

On Tue, 22 Jul 2008 19:46:38 -0700, "Pau Popinjay" <paupopinjay[no
spam]@sbcglobal.net> wrote:

>"K.T. Constanjuror88poet" <ktconstanjuror88poet.RemoveThis@aol.com> wrote in message
>
>> ... and I from this point forward no
>> longer consider myself your "good buddy".
>>
>
>Wtf? You just called him 'Bob'!

And if your head wasn't doing its best polyp impersonation up Russ's
small intestine, you'd know he's also Fed_Up Bob !


But hey... hey, I get your point, P. You wonder how I can call him Bob
one minute then unceremoniously kick him to the curb the next... but
hey, the guy deserves it, ya know?

Seems like I *am* in the market for a NEW "good buddy", tho.

Might you be available, Pau?... We could do all kinds of fun stuff
like shop for watermelons and cherries while gettin' drunk on some
2-buck Chuck... hell, we can even hang out at the Funhog.

We'll even bring Paulina and Kanesha Tanesha along...
 >> Stay informed about: Just tell the doctor what you see, Paul... 

"K.T. Constanjuror88poet" <ktconstanjuror88poet.DeleteThis@aol.com> wrote in message
news:0i9d849u5chjl4qp84mtigu80eqg845o8r@4ax.com...
> On Tue, 22 Jul 2008 19:46:38 -0700, "Pau Popinjay" <paupopinjay[no
> spam]@sbcglobal.net> wrote:
>
>>"K.T. Constanjuror88poet" <ktconstanjuror88poet.DeleteThis@aol.com> wrote in message
>>
>>> ... and I from this point forward no
>>> longer consider myself your "good buddy".
>>>
>>
>>Wtf? You just called him 'Bob'!
>
> And if your head wasn't doing its best polyp impersonation up Russ's
> small intestine, you'd know he's also Fed_Up Bob !
>
>
> But hey... hey, I get your point, P. You wonder how I can call him Bob
> one minute then unceremoniously kick him to the curb the next... but
> hey, the guy deserves it, ya know?
>
> Seems like I *am* in the market for a NEW "good buddy", tho.
>
> Might you be available, Pau?... We could do all kinds of fun stuff
> like shop for watermelons and cherries while gettin' drunk on some
> 2-buck Chuck... hell, we can even hang out at the Funhog.
>

I just got home from getting a watermelon. It's like almost 10:00 p.m., and
not too many Mexicans at the supermarket tonight, so it was a quick in and a
quick out, with my watermelon. But I'm not a happy camper. There's a nice
dog out front. I looked the other way and went around him on my way in.
The whole time I'm in the market I am hoping he is gone when I come out.
Well, he was still there. I asked the security guard if he had been there
long. Yes, they need security guards, at the friggin MARKET! At least in
THAT neighborhood anyway. But anyway, he said the dog had been there about
five hours. Looked like a nice dog. Young. Medium sized, maybe a little
pit in him. Walking with a limp to one of the rear legs. But I CAN'T SAVE
THE WHOLE WORLD! He saw me and the security guard talking, and he knew we
were talking about him. I saw his tail wag a little bit. I quickly went
around the post away from him and rushed to my car before I started crying.
No tags. No collar. These FUCKING PEOPLE in the Mexican neighborhood, they
don't give a fuck about their dogs. They don't take care of them. They
just let them run loose. Why do they even get them in the first place?
Fucking people. All the women in the market are fat, the ones with all the
brats anyways. Not the meth skanks. They're not fat. But most of the
women are fat. THEY'RE FAT! They stuff their faces with
chips and cokes and crap! And they give that shit to their kids too! And
they've GOT THE MONEY to buy those stupid magazines at the checkout counters
with all the movie stars and shit, BUT THEY DON'T HAVE THE MONEY TO TAKE
CARE OF THEIR PETS! I hate people. I hate 'em!

-PP
 >> Stay informed about: Just tell the doctor what you see, Paul... 

On Tue, 22 Jul 2008 20:49:06 -0700, "Robert W. Ladd" <rladd5 RemoveThis @cox.net>
wrote:

>Yes he did, but I think my post also burned his ass so much that I believe
>that he is going to back out on our "best buddy" arrangement. So it appears
>that I've been relegated back to "Weasel" or Dubya 2 or something else.
>
>Robert W. Ladd

You never left Weasel or Dubya 2 status, former-best-buddy...

It was simply my magnanimity that allowed us to move past such
realities and strike such an arrangement.

But now LOOK WHAT YOU'VE DONE!?!

You've abused my magnanimity, and as a result of your recklessness,
our buddydom lies in shambles.

Hell, now all ya probably have left on this NG to cozy up to is
Gizmo...

>"Paul Popinjay" <paulpopinjay[no spam]@sbcglobal.net> wrote in message
>news:NYwhk.30931$co7.25340@nlpi066.nbdc.sbc.com...
>> "K.T. Constanjuror88poet" <ktconstanjuror88poet RemoveThis @aol.com> wrote in message
>>
>>> ... and I from this point forward no
>>> longer consider myself your "good buddy".
>>>
>>
>> Wtf? You just called him 'Bob'!
>>
>
 >> Stay informed about: Just tell the doctor what you see, Paul... 

"K.T. Constanjuror88poet" <ktconstanjuror88poet.TakeThisOut@aol.com> wrote in message
news:oabd841m3dkr0r3as0dp9bmehdsls452jd@4ax.com...
> On Tue, 22 Jul 2008 20:49:06 -0700, "Robert W. Ladd" <rladd5.TakeThisOut@cox.net>
> wrote:
>
>>Yes he did, but I think my post also burned his ass so much that I believe
>>that he is going to back out on our "best buddy" arrangement. So it
>>appears
>>that I've been relegated back to "Weasel" or Dubya 2 or something else.
>>
>>Robert W. Ladd
>
> You never left Weasel or Dubya 2 status, former-best-buddy...
>
> It was simply my magnanimity that allowed us to move past such
> realities and strike such an arrangement.
>
> But now LOOK WHAT YOU'VE DONE!?!
>
> You've abused my magnanimity, and as a result of your recklessness,
> our buddydom lies in shambles.
>

Years from now I'm sure I'll look back and curse my stubborn push for
honesty and wish I had given in to your distortions. But, in truth, what
kind of friendship could we have had over those years if I had backed off
and let you tell everyone what I meant when it wasn't the truth. It's just
something I'll have to live with.

>
> Hell, now all ya probably have left on this NG to cozy up to is
> Gizmo...
>

It's always a sad time when one loses a friend, but at least as far as
personality and integrity goes, Gizmo will be a step up.

>
>>"Paul Popinjay" <paulpopinjay[no spam]@sbcglobal.net> wrote in message
>>news:NYwhk.30931$co7.25340@nlpi066.nbdc.sbc.com...
>>> "K.T. Constanjuror88poet" <ktconstanjuror88poet.TakeThisOut@aol.com> wrote in
>>> message
>>>
>>>> ... and I from this point forward no
>>>> longer consider myself your "good buddy".
>>>>
>>>
>>> Wtf? You just called him 'Bob'!
>>>
>>
>
 >> Stay informed about: Just tell the doctor what you see, Paul...