Just tell the doctor what you see, Paul...

On Wed, 23 Jul 2008 07:57:48 -0700, "Robert W. Ladd" <rladd5 DeleteThis @cox.net>
wrote:

>You can call me "Weasel", or Dubya 2, or just about anything else, but don't
>start comparing me to RassO or I may have to look you up and wipe the floor
>with your ass.

Uh oh... ooooooooo... Fed_Up Bob now Big_Bad Bob?

Comin' after me, huh?

Are ya gonna be borrowing Turbo's walker?


>Robert W. Ladd
>
>"K.T. Constanjuror88poet" <ktconstanjuror88poet DeleteThis @aol.com> wrote in message
>news:m6od84hu0or7kspp4r9ehe4rhhrms4qp9j@4ax.com...
>> On Wed, 23 Jul 2008 00:32:01 -0700, "Paul Popinjay" <paulpopinjay[no
>> spam]@sbcglobal.net> wrote:
>>
>>>"RazzO" <razzo DeleteThis @razzo.com> wrote in message
>>>news:cd2jl5x2bv.ln2@recgroups.com...
>>>
>>>> Joe? It's on you. You really don't think President Bush has done well,
>>>> do
>>>> you?
>>>>
>>>> If so, please list.
>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>Razzo, dude, what the fuck are you on, man? Seriously, where the fuck did
>>>you come up with this shit?
>>
>> I think he's on the same stuff Bob Ladd is on...
>
 >> Stay informed about: Just tell the doctor what you see, Paul... 

"K.T. Constanjuror88poet" <ktconstanjuror88poet RemoveThis @aol.com> wrote in message
news:0k8f84l377uujqmt6n2718rn7kougu44lb@4ax.com...
> On Wed, 23 Jul 2008 07:57:48 -0700, "Robert W. Ladd" <rladd5 RemoveThis @cox.net>
> wrote:
>
>>You can call me "Weasel", or Dubya 2, or just about anything else, but
>>don't
>>start comparing me to RassO or I may have to look you up and wipe the
>>floor
>>with your ass.
>
> Uh oh... ooooooooo... Fed_Up Bob now Big_Bad Bob?
>
> Comin' after me, huh?
>
> Are ya gonna be borrowing Turbo's walker?
>

I'll use my own, thank you! It's custom made, with all kinds of special
pockets hanging off it for my brass knuckles and blackjacks. It's also got
wheels on two of the four legs, in case you start running away.

Robert Ladd

>
>>Robert W. Ladd
>>
>>"K.T. Constanjuror88poet" <ktconstanjuror88poet RemoveThis @aol.com> wrote in message
>>news:m6od84hu0or7kspp4r9ehe4rhhrms4qp9j@4ax.com...
>>> On Wed, 23 Jul 2008 00:32:01 -0700, "Paul Popinjay" <paulpopinjay[no
>>> spam]@sbcglobal.net> wrote:
>>>
>>>>"RazzO" <razzo RemoveThis @razzo.com> wrote in message
>>>>news:cd2jl5x2bv.ln2@recgroups.com...
>>>>
>>>>> Joe? It's on you. You really don't think President Bush has done well,
>>>>> do
>>>>> you?
>>>>>
>>>>> If so, please list.
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>Razzo, dude, what the fuck are you on, man? Seriously, where the fuck
>>>>did
>>>>you come up with this shit?
>>>
>>> I think he's on the same stuff Bob Ladd is on...
>>
>
 >> Stay informed about: Just tell the doctor what you see, Paul... 

"Robert Ladd" <rladd5.RemoveThis@cox.net> wrote in message
news:_mOhk.43084$NU3.6092@newsfe01.iad...
>
> "K.T. Constanjuror88poet" <ktconstanjuror88poet.RemoveThis@aol.com> wrote in message
> news:669f84tkdchvav3sbaqadjnnfdm96gqb1e@4ax.com...
>> On Wed, 23 Jul 2008 13:24:35 -0500, "Susan" <sdbratt48.RemoveThis@netscape.net>
>> wrote:
>>
>>>"Robert Ladd" <rladd5.RemoveThis@cox.net> wrote in message
>>>news:ceuhk.4387$8R1.3065@newsfe03.iad...
>>>> It really burns your ass when someone agrees with Russ, especially if
>>>> they
>>>> are right, doesn't it?
>>>>
>>>> Robert Ladd
>>>>
>>>
>>>What is really amazing is that those of use who know, who were there, who
>>>saw things, are the ones who are wrong.
>>>
>>>The new kids who think they know everything, who weren't there are the
>>>ones
>>>who are right.
>>
>> No matter how many times it's been explained to you in a zillion
>> different ways... you still don't "get it", PDS... and you never will.
>>
>> Only a fool doesn't believe that cheating has/does/will always
>> occur(ed) in poker... THAT'S NOT IN DISPUTE.
>>
>> Russ's accumulated piles of bullshit on a plethora of things/people
>> *is* what's in dispute, however (I've always said, Russ is 90/10%
>> bullshit to truth).
>>
>
> We agree, now we'll just have to haggle over the percentage, and what
> falls into which category. My guess is that we're still a world apart.
>
> Robert Ladd

Percentage slightly off because I can personally state that I have first
hand knowledge - eye witness account - call it what you may of 90% of what
he says.

Can I prove it? Of course not.

But keep on your little wonderland. BTW, Robert, this is in response to
whoevery you responded to. I must have that person killfiled.
 >> Stay informed about: Just tell the doctor what you see, Paul... 

On Wed, 23 Jul 2008 08:07:48 -0700, "Robert W. Ladd" <rladd5 DeleteThis @cox.net>
wrote:

>Don't you worry about my confirmation number. I've been assured by PP that
>it's in the mail and thus I have all rights conferred to me. I even got a
>semi-official "posting membership card" that I can use until my real
>membership card come in.

Well, you being a weasel and all, you'll forgive me if I withhold
judgment on the veracity of your statement until PAUL checks in and
confirms.

Regardless, due to your actions last night, DO NOT expect to get your
official "best buddy" paraphernalia (name tag, stickpin, bumper
sticker, etc.../ packet had already shipped, but I put a stop-order in
early this morning).

You blew it BIG-TIME, bud. $40 value too!

>That wasn't a rule, it was a request. I did say "please assume". And
>there you are with the name calling again. At least you didn't call me
>Razzo2.

C'mon, I'm an ethical guy... I would never stoop THAT low.

>Robert W. Ladd
 >> Stay informed about: Just tell the doctor what you see, Paul... 

"K.T. Constanjuror88poet" <ktconstanjuror88poet.RemoveThis@aol.com> wrote in message
news:eu6f849q9g86i79a1acum1s94mr4bb74qr@4ax.com...
> On Wed, 23 Jul 2008 08:07:48 -0700, "Robert W. Ladd" <rladd5.RemoveThis@cox.net>
> wrote:
>
>>Don't you worry about my confirmation number. I've been assured by PP
>>that
>>it's in the mail and thus I have all rights conferred to me. I even got a
>>semi-official "posting membership card" that I can use until my real
>>membership card come in.
>
> Well, you being a weasel and all, you'll forgive me if I withhold
> judgment on the veracity of your statement until PAUL checks in and
> confirms.
>

Why me? I'm only the ASSISTANT Coordinator.
 >> Stay informed about: Just tell the doctor what you see, Paul... 

On Wed, 23 Jul 2008 15:36:46 -0700, "Robert Ladd" <rladd5.RemoveThis@cox.net>
wrote:

>We agree, now we'll just have to haggle over the percentage, and what falls
>into which category. My guess is that we're still a world apart.
>
>Robert Ladd

Ok, Bob, upon reflection, I'll concede that my 90/10% is hyberbolic.

Instead of haggling over percentages... how bout this?

Would you say (considering the TOTALITY of what Russ has posted on
RGP) that the majority falls into the TRUE or UNTRUE category. Let's
keep it simple. Totality of Russ postings (on all subjects)...
majority of them are: TRUE or UNTRUE.

Obviously you know where I stand...
 >> Stay informed about: Just tell the doctor what you see, Paul... 

> It'll save Russ the cost of the colonoscopy.

This whole thread is ONE person arguing with themselves. Reminds me of
that movie Identity with John Cusack. Make sure you get them ALL PeePee.
Leave only the good one. And watch out for that little fucking kid!

TIGERS World Series- 35, 45, 68, 84
RED WINGS Stanley Cups- 36, 37, 43, 50, 52, 54, 55, 97, 98, 02, 08
PISTONS Championships- 44, 45, 89, 90, 05
LIONS Superbowls- lol

BOOM byae
John

________________________________________________________________________ 
looking for a better newsgroup-reader? - www.recgroups.com
 >> Stay informed about: Just tell the doctor what you see, Paul... 

What in the world are you talking about? "ONE person arguing with
themselves"? I look back up the thread and I'm wondering if you are seeing
all of the posts. I'd get my newsreader fixed or replaced if I were you.

Robert Ladd

"John_Brian_K" <a7ecb57.DeleteThis@webnntp.invalid> wrote in message
news:82gml5x8fe.ln2@recgroups.com...
>> It'll save Russ the cost of the colonoscopy.
>
> This whole thread is ONE person arguing with themselves. Reminds me of
> that movie Identity with John Cusack. Make sure you get them ALL PeePee.
> Leave only the good one. And watch out for that little fucking kid!
>
> TIGERS World Series- 35, 45, 68, 84
> RED WINGS Stanley Cups- 36, 37, 43, 50, 52, 54, 55, 97, 98, 02, 08
> PISTONS Championships- 44, 45, 89, 90, 05
> LIONS Superbowls- lol
>
> BOOM byae
> John
>
> ________________________________________________________________________
> looking for a better newsgroup-reader? - www.recgroups.com
>
>
 >> Stay informed about: Just tell the doctor what you see, Paul... 

On Jul 24 2008 12:19 PM, Robert Ladd wrote:

> What in the world are you talking about? "ONE person arguing with
> themselves"? I look back up the thread and I'm wondering if you are seeing
> all of the posts. I'd get my newsreader fixed or replaced if I were you.
>
> Robert Ladd

YOU 'may' be a real person. KT, PeePee and Razzo 'may' also all be
different people. I am not so sure of the latter.

TIGERS World Series- 35, 45, 68, 84
RED WINGS Stanley Cups- 36, 37, 43, 50, 52, 54, 55, 97, 98, 02, 08
PISTONS Championships- 44, 45, 89, 90, 05
LIONS Superbowls- lol

BOOM byae
John

______________________________________________________________________ 
* kill-files, watch-lists, favorites, and more.. www.recgroups.com
 >> Stay informed about: Just tell the doctor what you see, Paul... 

You're kidding, of course. One of the pitfalls of not being face to face is
there is no body language. You can't look into someone's eyes online and
see the little twinkle that tells you they are joking or lying. The
alternative would be that, as they said in the movie Ruthless People, "This
could very well be the stupidest man on the face of the Earth".

Robert Ladd

"John_Brian_K" <a7ecb57.TakeThisOut@webnntp.invalid> wrote in message
news:raoml5xnhf.ln2@recgroups.com...
> On Jul 24 2008 12:19 PM, Robert Ladd wrote:
>
>> What in the world are you talking about? "ONE person arguing with
>> themselves"? I look back up the thread and I'm wondering if you are
>> seeing
>> all of the posts. I'd get my newsreader fixed or replaced if I were you.
>>
>> Robert Ladd
>
> YOU 'may' be a real person. KT, PeePee and Razzo 'may' also all be
> different people. I am not so sure of the latter.
>
> TIGERS World Series- 35, 45, 68, 84
> RED WINGS Stanley Cups- 36, 37, 43, 50, 52, 54, 55, 97, 98, 02, 08
> PISTONS Championships- 44, 45, 89, 90, 05
> LIONS Superbowls- lol
>
> BOOM byae
> John
>
> ______________________________________________________________________
> * kill-files, watch-lists, favorites, and more.. www.recgroups.com
>
 >> Stay informed about: Just tell the doctor what you see, Paul... 

I started to write a very long reply to this, detailing where I stand and
why. Then, as I was starting to put the finishing touches on it, the vision
of George Bailey sitting across from Mr. Potter after he was offered the job
at Potter's bank. At first he couldn't put his finger on it, but he knew
that something wasn't right, and then it hit him. I look back on two
previous examples where I tried to explain what I meant by something and all
I got was misrepresentation and being called a "weasel" and worse.

No thanks KT. With our recent history I don't think giving you any more pot
shots at me would be wise. We're worlds apart and I'll just accept that.

Robert Ladd

"K.T. Constanjuror88poet" <ktconstanjuror88poet DeleteThis @aol.com> wrote in message
news:4rcf84pp7n46pq2lqvg8hjvlk1jv4br1m4@4ax.com...
> On Wed, 23 Jul 2008 15:36:46 -0700, "Robert Ladd" <rladd5 DeleteThis @cox.net>
> wrote:
>
>>We agree, now we'll just have to haggle over the percentage, and what
>>falls
>>into which category. My guess is that we're still a world apart.
>>
>>Robert Ladd
>
> Ok, Bob, upon reflection, I'll concede that my 90/10% is hyberbolic.
>
> Instead of haggling over percentages... how bout this?
>
> Would you say (considering the TOTALITY of what Russ has posted on
> RGP) that the majority falls into the TRUE or UNTRUE category. Let's
> keep it simple. Totality of Russ postings (on all subjects)...
> majority of them are: TRUE or UNTRUE.
>
> Obviously you know where I stand...
 >> Stay informed about: Just tell the doctor what you see, Paul... 

Oh, BTW to answer your question as simply as I can, I honestly believe that
most of what Russ writes here is true, or at least he believes his sources
are true.

Robert Ladd

"K.T. Constanjuror88poet" <ktconstanjuror88poet DeleteThis @aol.com> wrote in message
news:4rcf84pp7n46pq2lqvg8hjvlk1jv4br1m4@4ax.com...
> On Wed, 23 Jul 2008 15:36:46 -0700, "Robert Ladd" <rladd5 DeleteThis @cox.net>
> wrote:
>
>>We agree, now we'll just have to haggle over the percentage, and what
>>falls
>>into which category. My guess is that we're still a world apart.
>>
>>Robert Ladd
>
> Ok, Bob, upon reflection, I'll concede that my 90/10% is hyberbolic.
>
> Instead of haggling over percentages... how bout this?
>
> Would you say (considering the TOTALITY of what Russ has posted on
> RGP) that the majority falls into the TRUE or UNTRUE category. Let's
> keep it simple. Totality of Russ postings (on all subjects)...
> majority of them are: TRUE or UNTRUE.
>
> Obviously you know where I stand...
 >> Stay informed about: Just tell the doctor what you see, Paul... 

"Robert Ladd"

> Oh, BTW to answer your question as simply as I can, I honestly believe
> that most of what Russ writes here is true, or at least he believes his
> sources are true.

You are just entirely too reasonable and polite, Robert. I am not sure I
always agree with you, but my respect for you has grown significantly over
the last many weeks ... for whatever it is worth.

Might you, perhaps, drop by and say hello at BARGE or somewhere sometime?
 >> Stay informed about: Just tell the doctor what you see, Paul...